Important actions ended without clear feedback
Users could complete financially sensitive actions without an explicit success, failure or next-step state.
A four-week product-design engagement that turned a fragmented wallet experience into a clearer, more consistent system with visible security at its core.
Overview
MINGO was expanding from a digital wallet into a wider Web3 ecosystem spanning assets, ticketing, collectibles and marketplace experiences. The wallet sat at the center, but the product felt assembled in separate eras rather than designed as one connected service.
The original request sounded visual: modernize the interface and make the experience consistent. The audit revealed a more important challenge. Users were being asked to perform unfamiliar, financially sensitive actions without always receiving enough guidance, confirmation or visible protection.
The project became a redesign of trust—not only a redesign of screens.
1 / 5 Map the ecosystem before redesigning individual screens.
Context · Engagement
MINGO first hired me to redesign its landing page and marketing experience. That narrower project shipped and demonstrated how an audit-first approach could create a clearer public product story.
The engagement then expanded into the work carrying greater product risk: the wallet, onboarding, transactions, ticketing and collectibles. That sequence mattered. Responsibility for a financial product was earned through delivery rather than assumed at the start.
Discovery · Product audit
I resisted redesigning on instinct. Instead, I reviewed the live experience screen by screen and documented where users could lose clarity, confidence or control.
The audit evaluated four dimensions: clarity, consistency, feedback and risk. This separated cosmetic inconsistencies from problems that could affect a user’s money, account access or understanding of what had just happened.
Users could complete financially sensitive actions without an explicit success, failure or next-step state.
Buttons, inputs, sheets and validation patterns changed across journeys, increasing the amount users had to relearn.
High-risk access and irreversible actions lacked visible protection, explanation and reassurance.
Define · Problem reframing
The visible inconsistency was a symptom. The deeper issue was that trust-critical moments had not been designed as complete journeys.
There was no deliberate pause before some irreversible actions, transaction outcomes were not always explicit, and sensitive wallet information lacked a clearly bounded access pattern.

Define · Decision principles
The short timeline meant that every stakeholder preference could not become a new design direction. I introduced four shared principles that the team could use to judge screens, flows and implementation tradeoffs.
The interface should make the next action and its consequences understandable before adding visual expression.
Users should be able to review financially sensitive information before committing an irreversible action.
Similar actions should use shared components, language and behavior so users do not have to relearn the ecosystem.
Protection should appear at relevant moments through confirmation, authentication and clear system states—not generic warnings everywhere.
Prioritization · Risk and impact
The audit uncovered more issues than the four-week engagement could responsibly solve. I prioritized journeys by user-trust risk and product impact instead of treating every screen as equally important.
Information architecture · Ecosystem model
The wallet needed to support asset management while also connecting users to tickets, marketplace and collectibles. I treated it as the primary home base, with ecosystem products revealed as connected destinations rather than competing navigation structures.
The new hierarchy separated wallet actions, ecosystem destinations and account or security controls so users could understand both where they were and where they could go next.
Interaction design · Onboarding
Onboarding was redesigned as a guided sequence rather than a dense setup form. The experience explained value first, reduced unnecessary choices, introduced security in context and ended with a useful next action.

Step 01 · Value
The opening experience introduces what the wallet enables before asking users to make technical setup decisions.
Interaction design · Transactions
Sending digital assets was restructured into three distinct moments. Each stage answered a different user question and reduced uncertainty at the highest-risk point in the wallet.
Review the asset, amount, recipient and relevant transaction information.
Separate reviewing the details from committing the irreversible action.
Show a clear pending, successful or failed outcome with a useful next action.
Security UX · Visible protection
Security was treated as a product behavior rather than a settings screen. The amount of friction matched the potential consequence of the action.
Access
Private information
Irreversible actions
System feedback
Visual design · Product system
Once the critical journeys were structured, I standardized typography, spacing, action hierarchy, forms, feedback states, cards, navigation and responsive behavior.
Consistency was not cosmetic polish. Shared patterns reduced relearning for users and reduced the number of one-off solutions engineering needed to maintain.
Outcome · Delivered change
The project delivered redesigned priority flows, visible security patterns and a reusable visual language across MINGO’s web and mobile experience.
Product
User experience
Team
Relationship
Reflection · What changed in my practice
The visible inconsistencies were real, but the more important gaps appeared where users had to understand risk, make a commitment and trust the result of an action.
The project reinforced three habits: audit before assuming, prioritize by consequence and make security understandable.
Given more time, I would conduct structured usability testing with both experienced Web3 users and people creating their first wallet, establish baseline metrics and compare error recovery across the redesigned flows.
I understand what is happening, I know what will happen next, and I feel confident continuing.The expectation the redesign was built to create
One conversation is enough to know if we’re a fit. Bring a real problem. No decks needed.
imaasimsharif@gmail.com